| The key words for the modern world intellectual discourse in the field of political 
  science and social philosophy – “human rights” and “civil society” – sound often 
  and intensively also in Ukraine during the last ten years. As many other terms, 
  like “democracy”, “freedom”, “social state”, “market economy” they had a couple 
  of problems. The power-keepers and their servants from the intellectual supply 
  surround tried to adapt these terms and to make them working for the existing 
  power regime and to quake simultaneously with the political strain of the post-Soviet 
  elites. The explanation that such effect could be achieved only by brutal deformation 
  of the original ideas or by lying to the public, is hardly to be needed. The 
  short-eyed academical professors with the “scientific communism” background 
  adapted the popular words to the level of their own understanding of the social; 
  processes or simply agressively opposed them. The common people knowing not 
  too much about the details of the long-term research of political scientists, 
  philosophers and lawyers, tried to jump “from feodalism to socialism”, what 
  however had a very sad result. They left the old without reaching the new and 
  loosing the trust in these fruits of Euro-Atlantic civilization even not tasting 
  them.
 The calling for the human rights has been the only possibility for the political 
  activists to act in Soviet times. Though they were suppressed by the political 
  repressing machine, the human rights category gave a chance to rely upon the 
  wide support at home and on the solidarity of the Western public opinion which 
  created a powerful institutional network of human rights protecting NGOs in 
  70eths. 
 Since Ukraine obtained the independence, a certain crisis stroke the Ukrainian 
  Rights protecting movement. The old political activists got a possibility to 
  work within the parties and to express openly in the national mass media, so 
  they changed the profile of their activities. The society faced dramatic problems 
  connected with simultaneous modernization and transformation almost in all branches. 
  Economic circumstances of all-national robbery by the small group of power keepers 
  became possible only in case of the extreme weakness of civil society in Ukraine 
  and complicated at the same time the process of its development. Almost knowing 
  nothing about the advantages of the free civil associations the Ukrainian citizen 
  got a powerful influence of Western individualist consumential philosophy of 
  values. The youth is especially sensitive to this test being not warmed by the 
  old Soviet myths, yet badly wounded by contemporary difficulties caused by realities 
  of post-colonial semi-reformed “third-worlded” Ukraine. The majority of citizen 
  preferred social rights much more than political liberties and even did not 
  feel themselves being already caught in the “closed cycle”. The new rights protection 
  movement, modern institutes for civil society in Ukraine still need help of 
  world society, financial support of Western foundations, cooperative pressure 
  on our government within the world NGOs network.
 The sharp social conflict in Ukraine caused in autumn’2000 by claiming the 
  power vertical in suppressing the freedom of expression, financial machinations 
  and falsification of the elections results denuded the poor condition of rights 
  protection guaranties and civil society development in our young state. But 
  at the same time the society understood the value of this paradigm for its own 
  security and development, though the Ukrainian ruling elites realized the harm 
  and destructiveness of misuse of the axiom well learned by their Western analogues.
       We hope that this issue would be helpful to all Ukrainian society as an instrument 
        for awareness of the present situation, to make parallels with the world 
        experience, to concentrate themselves on the contraversions an complications 
        of the world where we live. 
       Human rights and civil society are not simply theoretical concepts or the subject 
  for speculative thoughts for me, but modus vivendi, a kind of acception of existential 
  challenge and a way of complete valuable adoption of the own cultural identity. 
  Already more than 10 years I co-operate with various NGOs – “Prosvita”, “Memorial”, 
  Publishers Forum of Ukraine, Amnesty International, “Ji” Magazine. They all 
  are different but the co-operative desire of world improvement unites them. 
  And I believe that the world would become better indeed when each of us would 
  find his own place in it, not only as an individual but as a citizen and participant 
  of number of various virtual societies. As a person who does not ask “for whom 
  the bell talls” but acts following the conscience.
       Andriy Pavlyshyn, Head of Ukrainian Association of Amnesty International
 
 All texts are available in Ukrainian 
        (archive Ukr.)Civil Society
        Nancy L.Rosenblum. Civil Societies: Liberalism and Moral Influences 
          of Pluralism.The relationship between the liberalism and civil society as well as 
          with its main goals is described.
Robert Putnam. Playing Skittles Alone: American Social Capital 
          Decrease.What is going inside the modern American Society, what kind of changes 
          should be expected?
Jackie Smith. World Civil Society? International Civic Movements 
          and Organizations and Social Capital.The contemporary investigation of the role of international civic organizations 
          and movements in the world civil society development process.
Omar Incarnation. Toqueville MissionariesThe necessity of new understanding of civil society and its mission 
          is stressed.
Edward Albert Shills. Nation, Nationality, Nationalism and 
          Civil Society.Contemporary understanding, definitions and relating functions of the 
          mentioned terms are discussed.
Venjamin Novik. Christian Basis of Liberalism.The eternal roots of liberalism inside the Christian philosophy are 
          proved.
Anatoliy Karas’. Liberty and Solidarity Ethics in Civil Society.An attempt of characterization of three main aspects of the liberty 
          ethics: relationship between ethics and human rights; human rights and 
          life saving; civil society as an embodiment of the solidarian desire 
          to remove the violence and to prepare the public area for solving the 
          social tasks.
Shlomo Avineri. Chances and Obstacles on the Way to Civil Society 
          in Central and Eastern Europe.The democratization processes in Central and Eastern Europe (and particularly 
          in Russia), nationalistic tendencies and the basic goals of Western 
          help are described.
Thomas Paingle. Heideggerian Roots of Post-Modernism Discussion on the Nitschean an Heideggerian philosophic concepts concerning 
          cultural trends.
Yaryna Boren’ko. Civil Society and Political Power of Oligarchs.The characteristics of oligarchs influence on the political life of 
          contemporary Ukraine.
Antonina Kolodiy. Historical Evolution of Civil Society and 
          Its Ideas.Some modern approaches to the theory and applicable aspects of civil 
          society.
Robert Dahl. Changes of Democratic Governing Limits.Changes in the competence area of modern democratic governments are 
          investigated.
Francis Fukuyama. Primary of Culture.The four levels of strengthening of democracy are stressed and different 
          models of civil society are compared.
Richard Rohrthy. Post-Modernistic Bourgeois Liberalism Comparative analysis of different philosophical approaches to the problem 
          of post-modernism.
Boris Markov. After the Orgy We are living in the conditions of super-conduction which is not a product 
          of state, individuals or institutions, but of the transcendental structures 
          - sex, money, information, communication.
Ryszard Legutko. Conscience Immunity and Inside Life LibertyAnalysis of living model features described in the pieces of the prominent 
          social scientists and philosophers.
Olena Schurko. Yu.Habermas About the Sphere of Public Openness 
          The contribution of Yurgen Habermas to the investigation and clarifying 
          of the definition "civil society" is discussed.
Oleh Kolyasa. Interest Groups in the “State - Civil Society” 
          System Definition, role and place of the groups of interests in contemporary 
          society is studied.
Jaroslaw Makowski. Century of BaggarsGlobal processes and their influence on the social wealth decrease.
Vsevolod Retchytskyj. Ukrainian Constitution in Modern Context 
          The problems of adaptation of Ukrainian legal system to the modern democratic 
          demands to legislation.
Yurij Koroltchuk. Civil Society: Between the Conflict and Consensus 
          (Through the Prism of Communicative Philosophy)Real and false consensus, hesitation in discourse and other categories 
          in the civil society problem context.
Elias Canetti. Symbols of MassA short philosophical story.
Barnim Regalica. An Air-Cushion BoatA satiric futurological sketch.
Leszek Mazan. Events from Our Monarch’s LifeHumorous stories about the Franz-JosefI Habsburg's life.
 
 Human Rights
        Interview with Myroslav Marynovytch: I Believe in the Idea 
          of Human Dignity ProtectionPetro Rabinovytch. Human Rights: Unification of Names and Diversity 
          of Content (Theoretic and Methodological Notes)The different treating of the same human rights problems in various 
          countries.
Peter Jones. Human RightsThe history of their development and diversification .
Nataliya Dulnyeva. No Peace Without Justice, or Meditations 
          on the International Criminal CourtThe preconditions and process of the International Criminal Court adoption, 
          basic goals of its functioning and problems.
Anton Borkovs’kyj. Medieval Man and LibertyAn attempt of analysis of correlation between the Law and Faith in Middle 
          Ages.
Leszek Kolakowski. To the Problem Social Democracy Definition: 
          Human Rights Versus DemocracyLiberty should be reflected as a function of law and could be investigated 
          in the form of restrictions and limits.
Roman Romanov: In Case the Society Needs a Defence of Its Rights, 
          It Would Surely Support Them (Interview for “Ji” Magazine)Boguslaw Stanislawski. What Does It Mean to Be An Amnister?A story of the high functioner of Amnesty International.
Julianna Malevitch. Non-Western Human Rights Concept The key differences between the traditional Western human rights concept 
          and some other concepts are analyzed.
Waclaw Bielogradsky. For Your And Our Dignity The open letter to the President of Czech Republic Vaclav Havel.
Yevhen Zakharov. What is Human Rights Defence?The main tasks of the human rights protecting organizations.
Krzysztof Lozinski. Human Rights Universality and Cultural, 
          Traditional and Historical Experience Diversity Two main approaches could be stressed in the influence of cultural differences 
          on the human rights protection.
Svyatoslav Dobryanskyj. Human Rights Institute in Contemporary 
          International Law: Some Tendencies in Formation and DevelopmentInternational legal formula and support of the human rights.
Ivan Lischyna. International Mechanisms of Human Rights DefenceHuman rights have two main features: they are integral with the human 
          being and they proclaim equality of all the people.
Svitlana Marintsova. Arguments About the Right for Shelter 
          The main arguments to support the refugees in the contemporary world.
Aleksyej Tsvyetkov. Execution Who could be claimed for the executed by mistake?
Robert Walzer. A Farewell. World. A Piece About LibertyThree short stories
Paul Tibeaut. Human Rights ReligionAn interview to Gazeta Wyborcza (Poland)
Pin Gu. Land Red of Blood A story of the witness of execution in China
Nazar Hontchar. And HerPoetry
Guenter Grass. A Meal of Prophets. Inside the Egg.Two poems
  
 |